🔗 Share this article

In a unsigned order, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to implement a redrawn congressional map that could add as many as five additional Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three ruling, handed down on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to overturn a lower court's injunction that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Justices' Explanation

The district court improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and disturbing the fine balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in explaining its decision.

The district court had previously found that Texas had probably grouped voters according to their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to revert to the districts established after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissent

In a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's ruling. She stated that it disrespected the work of the lower court, noting that its opinion was written by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a infraction of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Fight

The court's action is part of a national contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a narrow Republican hold. Typically, map-drawing occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a chain reaction among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that are estimated to yield a number of additional Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have pushed back with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas top lawyer praised the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees representation favorable to the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

On the other hand, opposition party leaders decried the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major party election organization.

Another senior Democratic leader stated the court had another time eroded its standing by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.